This is a 2004 film compilation by Gábor Zsigmond Papp that presents a ‘best of’ series of clips from thirty years of Hungarian secret police training films geared toward protecting the socialist regime. Subjects covered include: how to place a bug, how to film people from handbag cameras, how to follow someone, how to secretly search a home, how to recruit agents, and how to effectively network for information gathering. These are all marvelous skills for finding a job in today’s high-tech world of modern American surveillance. But I view the film from an artistic perspective and find it fascinating in its easy ability to create mood and tension with the bare minimum of cinematic effort.
I can’t believe that I’m posting a video interview with Ron Paul about the ongoing horror show coming out of the TSA and the Obama administration. But the simple fact of the matter is that it really doesn’t matter who is attacking the President and the TSA for blatantly unconstitutional molestation and physical abuse of air passengers across the United States. It doesn’t matter if it’s Republicans or Tea Party dopes. The only thing that matters is that a free people with some hope of maintaining a democracy MUST stop a government that thinks it can go inside peoples’ clothes and touch their bodies in the name of very questionable security.
The Obama administration’s TSA must be stopped no matter what. It is an absolute imperative that they not be allowed to molest men, women or children who are simply exercising their right to travel freely. So I find myself fully in the camp of a political party that I normally want nothing to do with. When it comes to stopping the TSA and protecting the civil rights of people in this country it makes no difference who is leading the fight. It think this cause does in fact join Republicans with liberals. It’s one of the few things we can agree on.
The TSA has expressed concern about verbal and physical abuse being directed at its employees. They hope that passengers can understand the difference between the TSA employees and the officials making the policies. Except that the person you have to defend yourself from is the one standing in front of you trying to put his or her hand into your pants. You must defend yourself against that person. The policymakers will get the message and act eventually. But in the airport you must defend yourself against the person actually committing the assault.
One would of course want to do more than just ‘opt out’ if a child were treated this way by the frighteningly imbecilic TSA. You know, the regular airport police really don’t much like the TSA people very much and are probably just itching for a good reason to arrest one or two.
I thought of a possible alternative to the TSA’s threat to arrest or financially penalize people who try to opt out of the full body nude scanners and the groin touching pat down. One could simply opt out of the scanner and then state that although not refusing the pat down a request for local or airport police observation of the pat down procedure is insisted upon because one has a real fear of imminent sexual assault. That would seem to me to put the TSA officers at a serious disadvantage legally and force local police to come to the scene. Just a few episodes like this will really jam up airport gates all across the country and then the hand-job President might get the message that we’re all just fine without hands in our pants.
At the very least, passengers all across the country should be filming with their cell phones just like the guy in the video above.
Many airports in the United States and the United Kingdom have installed new full body scanners. They are easy to spot. You walk in and a security guard tells you to raise your arms out to the side. Then what happens is they take a naked photograph of you. Naked. Nude. Bare-assed. Birthday suit. Free as the wind blows. Exposed. Porno.
Why porno? Because they take naked pictures and look at them. They want to do it to children too. And guess what? In the U.K. it has suddenly been noticed that taking naked pictures of children in airports violates anti-child porn laws. You bet. Think about it. Your kid in the machine. Arms up in the air. Being photographed naked through his or her clothes. The TSA claims that a single operator in a booth will view the naked photos of boarding passengers and children. Fine. So think about that. A little fat guy sitting in there with his sandwich and his can of Coke watching you and your kids naked. Enjoy that image? Still want to fly? Or would you rather just drive now?
No one anywhere has the right to look at our naked bodies just because we are getting on an airplane. No one. I certainly will not enter one of these invasive machines under any circumstances. I think that airline passengers wherever they might be should absolutely refuse to walk into these things. That will create chaos and slow things down until these hysterical security people back off with the nude photos. Causing an uproar about this is probably the one thing that will stop the roll-out of these machines. President Obama may in fact expedite the increased use of these things. Well, he’s the bright bulb who’s hiding photos of U.S. military torture practices and now he wants nude photos of us and our kids. Cool guy, huh?
In many airports the machines are voluntary and offered as an option to avoid a pat-down. Not for long. The TSA wants these naked photos and they want them really bad. Have you met some of these TSA agents by any chance? My god! They are as dumb as posts. I met one a year ago at Los Angeles International Airport in the parking lot. She said she was lost. Lost! She couldn’t find the terminal building. I had to literally walk her through the airport to find her work station. I was just a passenger on my way somewhere. She was totally lost and completely at my mercy. I could have led her anywhere and stolen her badge. Trust me, if you can’t find the terminal at LAX, there’s something seriously wrong with you. That is the level of training these people are receiving. Another time, just months ago, I gave the finger to a TSA agent who tried to jump in front of me while boarding a crowded shuttle bus. He got on his phone and called airport police, saying that he had a dangerous passenger who had given him and his officers the finger. Four police cars showed up. Guess what happened when the officer in charge listened to the irate TSA guy. He smiled at him, then turned to me and said, “Sir, would you be interested in pressing any charges against the TSA?” I said, “No thanks, but it’s nice to know that a cop understands I’m allowed to give the finger to the TSA.” He said, “If you change your mind call me at this number.” Then he handed me a card! He said there were lots of complaints about the TSA people and that his officers were sick and tired of dealing with them because they didn’t understand any of the laws. And now we are asked to trust these TSA nitwits with naked photographs of ourselves and our children? Are you kidding? Seriously?
Nick Cross has made an animation seems to be mainly about 9/11. I’ve read quite a bit of nonsense around the web about this cartoon. Animation blogs that should know better do their best to avoid the brutal politics of the film even though those politics are its entire reason for existing. In fact, I find that most of the animation world on the web is shockingly conservative, embarrassingly non-diverse, and mind-numbingly infatuated with Walt Disney. In this creepy little film the fat cats need the little cakes that the bakers make in their village. For the life of me, I can’t figure out what kind of tiny animal the bakers are supposed to be. Little featherless tweety-birds maybe. Anyway, the fat cats take all the cakes under threat of annihilation and sell them in their city. When the bakers can’t stand the slavery anymore they blow up a house full of fat cats. Then the fat cats become extremely security-conscious and attack the bakers with bombs and slaughter them all. The end.
That’s my description of the film.
I like people who are nasty and drive their anger through their work. This film is off-balance and awkward. It’s unpleasant and crude. Why are the titles off-center? I do respect its attitude and its simple perspective on the reality behind the events of 9/11, but nevertheless it annoys me. Why do animators persist in trying to reproduce the quality of animation from the 1930s? I’d prefer less cute flip-floppiness from the animator. Give me the politics. Leave out the throat lozenge.